Library Scientific Communication Journal Selection for Publishing

Journal Selection for Publishing

Selection of the most suitable journal for publishing involves two essential steps – finding the journal and assessing its quality:

Journals can be searched in various sources, but the most convenient and reliable ones are: bibliographic databases and publishers' websites.
The quality of a journal can be assessed from a variety of perspectives. However, it has become a common practice to evaluate journals by their values of journal citation indicators.

Journal Search in Databases

For finding reliable, high quality journals (peer reviewed, referenced) it is advisable to perform the journal search in bibliographic databases.
It is important to note that both the coverage and variety of indexed journals and the classification of disciplines vary between databases, so journal search results will also differ.

Web of Science (WoS) indexed journal search

Web of Science (WoS) indexed journals can be searched using the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) tool or at the Master Journal List website:

JCR tool allows to perform a targeted search for journals [1] (by title, ISSN number, or keywords), and/or filter JCR indexed journals by selected discipline and/or other criteria [3]:

Methods and criteria for narrowing JCR journal search:

Targeted search by name / ISSN / category / keywords
Search in results
Additional journal selection criteria/filters
Selection of indicators to be displayed for the searched journals

Scopus indexed journal search

All Scopus indexed periodical sources (not only journals, but also book series, conference proceedings and trade publications) can be searched in the Source section of the database.

Scopus sources can be searched by:

Title
Subject area
Publisher
ISSN

The search can be further narrowed by specifying additional criteria (Display options).

It is also possible to download lists of all Scopus indexed sources in Excel format, which can be filtered by subject areas or by other selected criteria.

Scopus indexed journals can also be searched on the Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) website. Here the journal search can also be refined by selected subject areas or categories, country/region, publication type and year:

Journal Search on Publisher Websites

Journals can also be searched (by browsing or within specific disciplines) on the individual publishers’ websites:
Emerald Journals
Springer Nature Journals
Oxford Journals
Which PLOS journal best fits your research?
PubMed PubReMiner
Sage Journals
Science Journals
SpringerLink
Taylor and Francis Online
Wiley Find a Journal

Having a prepared manuscript, the most convenient way to find the journal most suitable for its publishing is to use the journal search for publishing tools provided by some publishers, which select the most appropriate journals based on the title, summary, and keywords of the manuscript:
Elsevier Journal Finder
Springer Journal Suggester
Wiley Journal Finder

A similar approach is applied in the Match Manuscript tool available on the Master Joural List website, which allows to search for WoS indexed journals most suitable for publishing the manuscript (in order to use this tool, it is required to have a user account, but the tool can be accessed by login into WoS account used for all other WoS products):

If it is intended to publish article or other type of publication by open access model, suitable journals from various publishers can be found in the Open Access source registries, databases, or by filtering open access sources at publisher websites.

Journal Quality Assessment

The quality of journals can be assessed in different aspects, considering:

Editorial criteria (with the most important one being an implementation of peer review)
The composition of the editorial board and the competences of its members
Publisher credibility
The scope and periodicity of the journal
Applicable publishing models
Relevance of the covered topics, etc.

However, nowadays the assessment of journal quality is mainly based on citations accrued by the publications published in it. For convenience, citation data of all journal’s publications are expressed as journal citation indicators.

Journal Citation Indicators

The main bibliographic databases (WoS and Scopus) provide various journal citation indicators, but the main and the most widely used for evaluation purposes are: WoS – Journal Impact Factor (JIF); Scopus – CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) and Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) indicators.

The comparison of the main journal citation indicators provided in WoS and Scopus databases is provided in the table:

Abbreviations used in the table:
AHCI – Arts & Humanities Citation Index
AIS – Article Influence Score
BKCI – Book Citation Index
CPCI – Conference Proceedings Citation Index
CWTS – Leiden University's Centre for Science & Technology Studies
ESCI – Emerging Source Citation Index
EJR – Eigenfactor Journal Ranking
Eigenfactor®– Eigenfactor® Project (University of Washington)
ES – Eigenfactor Score
JCI – Journal Citation Indicator
JCR – Journal Citation Reports – WoS journal analysis tool
JIF – Journal Impact Factor
MJL – Master Journal List – lists of WoS indexed journals
NT – netaikoma
SCIE – Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus – Scopus (Elsevier)
Scopus Sources
SCImago – SCIMago Lab
SCImago JR – SCImago Journal Rank (SCIMago Group)
SJR – SCImago Journal Rank
SNIP – Source Normalized Impact per Paper
SSCI – Social Science Citation Index
WoS – Web of Science (Clarivate)
WoS CC – Web of Science Core Collection

More about the main journal level quality indicators provided by WoS and Scopus – their calculation principles, differences and limitations – is provided here >>>

When assessing the quality of individual journals, it is important to pay attention to the accounting year for which the indicators were calculated. This is especially important when citation and/or position indicators are used to evaluate individual publications, as only the values of the indicators corresponding to the year of publication should be used for this purpose.

Journal Position (Rank) Indicators

Aiming to search only for journals that meet specific quality criteria, journal search in the databases can be restricted by specifying the desired journal quality criteria. For this purpose, journal rank in research categories expressed in quartiles (Q) is the most commonly used quality criterion.

In the main bibliographic databases (WoS and Scopus), journals are divided into category quartiles according to the values of their ranks in represented research fields/categories, expressed in percentiles. The ranks themselves are determined by the values of the main citation indicators used in that database (in WoS – by JIF, in Scopus – by CiteScore).

Journals are assigned to the quartiles in accordance with the percentile value thresholds:
Q1 – [99-75]
Q2 – [74-50]
Q3 – [49-25]
Q4 – [24-0]

By restricting the journal search by quartiles, the results will include those journals that fall into the selected quartiles in at least one of the research categories they represent. For example, if you search for Q1 journals, the results will return all journals that fall into the Q1 quartile in at least one category, but in other categories that the journal may be assigned to, it may occupy lower quartiles. Therefore, if it is necessary to select the highest quality journals in a specific field of science, it is recommended to select the research fields/categories of interest in the journal search criteria first.

The most convenient way to search WoS indexed journals occupying specific category quartiles, is to use an additional filter in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) tool:

In Scopus database the search for journals belonging to specific quartiles can also be performed:

In Scopus database does not provide direct quartile (Q) values for each source – they must be determined by the journal’s position (rank) in represented research category expressed in percentiles in accordance with the previously listed percentile value thresholds.

Journal ranks in percentiles at the Scopus Source page source list table are provided only for the category in which the journal occupies the highest position (Highest percentile) compared to the ranks in other journal represented categories. Journal's ranking values in all research categories it is assigned to are provided in the journal's profile (listed at the bottom of the profile page).

The quality of Scopus indexed journals can also be assessed on the Scimago Jaurnal & Country Rank (SJR) website. However, in this case, it is important to note that at the Scimago Jaurnal & Country Rank journals are ranked and assigned to quartiles according to their Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator values, while in Scopus DB journals are rated by their CiteScore values. Therefore, in some cases, the quartiles of the same journal in Scopus DB and in Scimago Jaurnal & Country Rank websites may not coincide.

Journal Comparison in Bibliographic Databases

An ability to directly compare several journals becomes especially useful when after accomplishment of initial steps of journal search, sorting, and evaluation, there are still more than one potentially suitable journal. The main bibliographic databases (DBs) recognize the importance of this opportunity and provide users with corresponding tools enabling the comparison of their indexed journals. In Scopus this functionality is available basically since the very beginning of the DS’s operation (more detailed information on Scopus indexed sources’ comparison tool is available here >>>). Meanwhile, the direct comparison of Web of Science (WoS) indexed journals become possible since the summer of 2022 and can be performed by employing an additional functionality added to the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) journal analysis tool (more information on JCR tool is provided here >>>).

In order to compare WoS indexed journals, it is needed to firstly perform a journal search in JCR tool. After marking at least one of the journals listed in the search results table, an additional toolbar will appear below the table, but the button for journal comparison will activate only after selecting at least two journals from the list (for comparison purposes it is possible to select up to four journals):

Clicking the “Compare” button opens a journal comparison window. Here additional journals can be easily added [2] and/or removed [1] from the comparison. It is also possible to indicate on which JCR year data the comparison will be based [3]:

Below the following information of compared journals is provided side-by-side:

general information (ISSN/eISSN numbers, represented categories, publishing country and language, publisher, and an indication of the most recent year for which JCR data is available for the journal);
information on the main journal citation indicators (JIF, JCI, and AIS, more information about these indicators is provided here >>>), including the values of the indicators corresponding to the selected JCR year [3] and their trends for the five-year period (counting backwards from the selected JCR year [3]), as well as journal positions in all categories their represent, also expressed as percentiles and quartiles (Q), separately for the cases of ranking journals by all of the aforementioned indicators;
information on the journals’ content proportions in regards of applied publishing model and access type, including an indication of which content types are included in the calculations of journal citation indicators as Citable Items.

Journal Suitability Assessment

After the initial journal search and / or selection of journals according to their quality and / or other criteria, it is necessary to make sure that the journal is suitable before submitting the manuscript for publishing in it.

The main aspects for evaluation of journal suitability:

It is necessary to carefully read the Aims and Scope section of the journal’s homepage and assess their compatibility with the manuscript to be published. It is also advisable to review the articles of the last and/or current issue of the journal since in case of some journals (especially, large ones) separate journal issues can be focused on a more specific/narrow topic.
Take into account the editorial provisions applicable to accepted manuscripts (types of publications accepted, restrictions on manuscript extent (pages / characters), language quality requirements, applied layout and citation styles, etc.).
Evaluate legal aspects (copyright, licenses, publishing ethics, etc.).
Consider other criteria important to the author (course and speed of the peer review / publication process, available publishing models, related fees, etc.).

In the recent decades along with the increased number of journals, the variety of models for publishing has also expanded. The main difference between these models raises from the two main aspects: how the publishing costs are covered/financed, and how does that affect the accessibility of the published content.

Journal types / Publishing models:

Traditional (Subscription-based)

Published content stays behind the paywall – the access to it has to be purchased (by subscribing or by paying the fee for an individual publication)
Publishing is free of charge
In most cases author rights of the publication are transferred to the publisher upon signing a Copyright Transfer Agreement.

Gold Open Access

Published content becomes freely accessible immediately after publishing
Publishing charges (Article Processing Charges, APCs) are applied
The published content is usually granted with the Creative Commons (CC) license ensuring that the author rights are retained by the author (are not transferred to the publisher)

Hybrid

Author can choose the model – Traditional or Gold Open Access – to be applied when publishing in such journal.

Journal Credibility Assessment

When searching for a journal on your own or considering publishing in the journal from which you received an invitation, you need to make sure that the journal are credible. With the rapid adoption of the Open Access publishing model, the number of so-called 'predatory' publishers or journals have also increased.

Predatory publishers/journals employs the Open Access publishing model to profit from authors by enticing them with a fast publishing process and low APCs, but without any real benefit to scientific communication: often the article ends up not being published at all, and the manuscript becomes unsuitable for re-publication in reliable journals. In this case, the authors not only lose the opportunity to publish valuable data and suffer financial losses, but also damage their reputation.

Predatory journals often create their profiles/websites by hijacking the information of the real and usually – well-known journal: journal title (or at least very similar one), ISSN, indexing and/or other information (information about the existing version of the predatory journal can sometimes be found on the website of the real journal). However, a list of other traits may expose the predatory nature of the journal.

Main characteristics of a predatory journal:

Unreasonably fast peer review process;
Urgent acceptance of the article for publishing;
Low article publishing fees (APC);
The physical address of the publisher is not always provided, usually only electronic contacts (often of academically unrelated e-mail domains, e.g. yahoo, gmail, etc.) of the publisher may be found;
It is not possible to identify the editor-in-chief of the journal;
the editorial board often consist of researchers from the same country and without their consent; contact details are not included or are not real;
The website contains broken links.

How to identify a predatory journal?
To choose the right journal for publishing, it is necessary not only evaluate journal’s suitability and citation impact, but also the credibility and international recognition of publisher and/or journal.

Predatory journals often indicate that they are indexed in various well-known databases, and have a value of citation indicator, which is actually a pseudo-indicator. This often confuses authors who want to publish in high-ranking journals possessing values of the main citation indicators. Examples of pseudo-indices: Advanced Science Index, General Impact Factor, Global Impact Factor, Journal Impact Factor, and Scientific Journal Impact Factor. Therefore, it is necessary to check whether the journal is indexed in international databases and/or has national recognition:

Master Journal List (WoS, Clarivate)
Journals Citation Reports (WoS, Clarivate)
Scopus Sources (Elsevier)
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
The Association of Lithuanian Serials

Important! With the rapid advancements in information technologies, predatory publishers/journals have also improved to a point that even commissions for the inclusion of new sources in major bibliographic databases sometimes do not recognize such journals and they are included into bibliographic databases (over time the unethical and selfish intentions of such journals are usually noticed and the journals are removed from databases).

One of the most trusted and widely recommended tool for assessing journal’s credibility is THINK. CHECK. SUBMIT.

Another useful tool is A list of predatory journals by U.S. librarian Jeffrey Beall

Additional information for authors

Publishers' advices and trainings on how to write and publish scientific articles:

Wiley-Blackwell: Author Services
Elsevier: How to publish in scholarly journals
Springer: How to submit a publication
Taylor&Francis: Developing High Impact Content

- Page administrators:
- Jolanta Juršėnė
- Asta Katinaitė-Griežienė
- Orinta Sajetienė
- Marta Širokova