How Women Scientists Are Changing the World

February 11, 2025
February 11th—International Day of Women in Science—serves as a reminder that women's contributions to science play a crucial role in solving societal challenges and are an integral part of driving innovation.

While female scientists are no longer a rarity, this day was only officially recognized a decade ago. In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly established the observance to promote greater participation of women in STEM fields and to advocate for equal rights. The goal was also to ensure that scientific advancements reflect the needs of diverse social groups.

According to UNESCO, women make up only 33% of the global scientific community. The gender gap is especially evident in developing countries, where limited infrastructure, cultural and societal beliefs, and financial constraints restrict girls' and women’s access to education. Meanwhile, in Western countries, women are more involved in science, yet they still face gender-related challenges. From a young age, societal stereotypes about differences between boys and girls often discourage girls from pursuing studies in STEM fields.

However, research consistently shows that women’s involvement in science, their diverse perspectives, and their unique experiences contribute to a more innovative and advanced world.

Why Does the Scientific World Need Women?

Dr. Jelena Kabulova, Deputy Director of the VILNIUS TECH Science Directorate, emphasizes that women’s involvement in science brings a broader perspective to problem-solving:

"Women often have different experiences, ways of thinking, and approaches to situations than men. Their inclusion, along with representation from diverse social groups, can drive the generation of new ideas that lead to more innovative solutions. Additionally, if a particular field is dominated by just one group, the products and technologies developed are likely to be designed primarily for that group’s needs."

She gives an example from automotive safety testing: for many years, crash tests were conducted using dummies modeled after the average male body. As a result, female drivers faced a significantly higher risk of severe injuries in accidents. It was only after female engineers became involved in the field that crash test dummies representing female body types were introduced, leading to changes in safety standards that better accounted for women’s anatomy.

A similar situation occurred in medicine. “Heart disease research was historically centered around male symptoms and treatment methods, which didn’t always apply to women. Female scientists recognized that heart disease manifests differently in women and that traditional diagnostic methods weren’t always accurate for them. Thanks to their work, research into women’s heart health expanded, leading to better understanding and more effective treatments.”

The same issue arose with medication dosages. For years, dosage recommendations were based solely on male test subjects, but female scientists highlighted the fact that women’s physiology—including differences in body composition, weight, and metabolism—necessitated different dosing guidelines. Their research led to improved treatment outcomes and reduced side effects for women.

Beyond medicine and engineering, female architects and urban planners have introduced a new perspective on city design, considering accessibility for parents with strollers, young children, and individuals with disabilities. They also identified a critical safety issue: many women feel unsafe using public transport or walking through parks at night. As a result, cities have improved street lighting, increased the frequency of public transport routes, and installed emergency call buttons in high-risk areas.

Research shows that teams with women tend to be more creative and effective, as their diverse experiences help generate better solutions and reduce the likelihood of errors. Additionally, female scientists are more likely to focus on pressing global challenges, such as sustainability, climate change, healthcare, and education gaps.

"Ultimately, this is not just about gender equality—women’s inclusion in science is a necessity. When we fail to incorporate diverse perspectives, we lose the opportunity to develop solutions that benefit the widest range of people. Only by integrating different experiences and ideas can we build a sustainable, innovative, and inclusive future," concludes Dr. Kabulova.

Related news

New doctoral dissertation
New doctoral dissertation
VILNIUS TECH Library invites you to follow the published new dissertations. The dissertation „Twin transition impact assessment model for agricultural performance in the context of sustainability“ prepared at VILNIUS TECH by Kristina Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė. The dissertation was prepared in 2020–2026. Scientific consultant – Dr Rasa Melnikienė. The dissertation was defended at the public meeting of the Dissertation Defence Council of the Scientific Field of Economics in the Aula Doctoralis Meeting Hall of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University at 10 a. m. on 22 September 2026. The twin transition in agriculture, combining the digital and green transitions, is one of the key directions of the European Union’s strategy for developing a more sustainable, resilient, and competitive agricultural sector. This dissertation addresses the problem of how to assess the impact of digital and green transitions on agricultural performance in the context of sustainability. The dissertation aims to develop and empirically substantiate the Twin Transition Impact Assessment Model. The model integrates three assessment levels: farm-level adoption and economic performance; the bioeconomy and value-chain level; and the national and regional context level. Structural asymmetries and enabling mechanisms are included as cross-cutting components. A mixed-methods research design was applied, combining scientific literature analysis, conceptual synthesis, case-study analysis, structured survey analysis, comparative assessment, correlation and regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, semi-structured interviews, document review, and the synthesis of empirical findings. The empirical basis consists of five interconnected studies covering small-farm digitalisation, digital technology adoption in sustainable agriculture and the bioeconomy, the twin transition in Lithuania and Romania, food supply-chain digitalisation, and structural asymmetries in Lithuania’s bioeconomy transition. The empirical results show that the twin transition improves agricultural performance when digital and green solutions are integrated across the farm, value chain, and regional and national levels. Digitalisation supports labour efficiency, planning, customer relations, investment decisions, loss reduction, traceability, product quality, and supply-chain visibility, while also contributing to resource efficiency, renewable energy use, water-use efficiency, emissions reduction, carbon sequestration, and climate resilience. The empirical evidence indicates that the effects of digital and green transitions depend on infrastructure, investment capacity, policy support, digital skills and institutional conditions. The results also show structural differences in transition outcomes: higher investment intensity does not automatically produce stronger economic results, and digital adoption may occur separately from ecological production orientation. On this basis, the dissertation concludes that digital and green transitions can strengthen agricultural performance and sustainability when they are integrated, context-specific and supported by enabling mechanisms. The proposed model provides a scientific and practical framework for assessing agricultural performance under the twin transition across farm-level, bioeconomy and agri-food value-chain, regional-national and structural dimensions. Doctoral dissertation readers can search via VILNIUS TECH Virtual Library.
More