Professor on the Four-Day Workweek Model: "It’s Only a Matter of Time"

February 7, 2025
As proposals to transition to a four-day workweek gain momentum, opposition to the idea remains strong. Some argue that "this is how it has always been," while others claim that "it would be too difficult for businesses." Meanwhile, skeptics suggest that such a model would not be compatible with certain industries.

"I have no doubt that the shift from a six-day to a five-day workweek in Henry Ford’s factories in 1926 or the first industrial revolution-era attempts to allow workers to rest—such as in the U.S. (1870), the UK (1871), and France (1936)—were also considered utopian and unrealistic at the time," says Prof. Dr. Vida Davidavičienė, Dean of the Faculty of Business Management at VILNIUS TECH.

According to her, resistance to an unfamiliar idea is normal, but ignoring the evolving business landscape and the needs and expectations of a new generation of workers is not an option.

"Countries and organizations that postpone or ignore this issue will lose their competitive edge, end up with less motivated employees, and see a workforce that is more exhausted compared to their competitors," the professor explains.

Moreover, this concept is not entirely new—it has already been tested or implemented in various forms across 23 countries, including Ireland, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Iceland, Spain, Japan, the United States, Norway, the Netherlands, South Africa, Finland, the UAE, the UK, Germany, and others.

Lithuania is among these nations, having joined the ranks in 2021 when the workweek for parents with children under three years old was reduced to 32 hours. Additionally, some Lithuanian companies have already adopted the four-day workweek model, with Vilniaus Šilumos Tinklai being the most notable example.

"There are many different pilot models in place, and attention to this issue is growing. Therefore, it is likely that in the near future, as the benefits of the four-day workweek become more evident, we will see a broader shift toward this way of organizing work," says the VILNIUS TECH professor.

Employers who have tested this model highlight its key advantages, such as a better work-life balance, reduced stress and burnout risk, increased employee satisfaction, and improved talent retention.

"For hesitant employers, one of the strongest arguments is increased productivity. Research shows that shorter workweeks enhance efficiency and focus. Employees spend less time on unproductive meetings and distractions. For example, a Forbes study found that workers on a four-day schedule were 20% more productive, and their overall well-being improved. Meanwhile, a 2019 experiment by Microsoft Japan revealed a staggering 40% increase in productivity," says Prof. Dr. V. Davidavičienė.

Sustainability is another crucial factor. A four-day workweek would help reduce office operating costs, decrease commuting expenses for employees, and lower expenses related to childcare and other work-related costs. Less commuting would also mean reduced carbon emissions and a smaller environmental footprint.

However, doubts remain. According to the VILNIUS TECH researcher, many employees worry that a shorter workweek could result in longer working hours, and in some industries, implementing such a model could be particularly challenging.

*"In sectors like customer service, there are concerns about operational efficiency and potential disruptions. Meanwhile, industries such as healthcare, emergency services, and retail require continuous presence.

There will always be opponents, and some of their arguments are valid. However, by assessing each case individually, businesses can find solutions that work for both employers and employees, ensuring optimal results,"* concludes Prof. Dr. V. Davidavičienė.

Related news

New VILNIUS TECH eBook
New VILNIUS TECH eBook
Nauja VILNIUS TECH elektroninė knyga: Kristina Stankevičiūtė, Jūratė Černevičiūtė, Stasys Mostauskis, Liutauras Labanauskas, Marius Salynas Reflecting Popular Culture: Theories and Research (Reflektuojant popkultūrą: teorijos ir tyrimai)Collected Monograph The book is written in Lithuanian This book is the first volume of the planned five-volume monograph series Popular Culture in Lithuania. Its principal aim is to examine the understanding of the phenomenon of popular culture and the nature of its perception as they are relevant in the Lithuanian context, thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for the further analysis of the field of popular culture, which is intended to be presented in the subsequent volumes of the series. The overall objective of the monograph series is to chart the field of popular culture in Lithuania and to survey its current situation, assessing both its historical development and possible prospects for future research. The first volume presents theoretical discussions outlining the concept of popular culture as a phenomenon, its philosophical, aesthetic, and industrial characteristics, and its history of emergence. These discussions are grounded in the traditional conception of popular culture as standing in opposition to serious or high culture. Taken together, the contributions may be broadly described as belonging to a field of academic research oriented toward the theoretical reflection on popular culture. The volume is intended for researchers and students in the field of cultural studies, as well as for all those interested in processes within the cultural sphere. eBook edition >>> * VILNIUS TECH extends complimentary access to its entire library of e-books to members within the university community. Institutional users are granted cost-free access to the e-books by logging onto the University's computer network, whether on-site or remotely through a Virtual Private Network (VPN). To facilitate offline reading without an internet connection, it is requisite to install the IPC Reader offline application. Users can subsequently download the desired e-books while connected to the institutional network and read them offline at their convenience. For additional details concerning e-books, please refer to the provided link >>>
More
New doctoral dissertation
New doctoral dissertation
VILNIUS TECH Library invites you to follow the published new dissertations. The dissertation „A framework for assessing food loss and waste along the food supply chain: the case of Lithuania“ prepared at VILNIUS TECH by Ovidija Eičaitė. The dissertation was prepared in 2025–2026. Scientific consultant – Dr Tomas Baležentis. The dissertation was defended at the public meeting of the Dissertation Defence Council of the Scientific Field of Economics in the Aula Doctoralis Meeting Hall of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University at 10 a.m. on 11 June 2026. Food loss and waste (FLW) represents a global challenge with serious environmental, economic, and social implications. It contributes to inefficient use of resources, increased greenhouse gas emissions, and financial losses across the food supply chain (FSC), while also undermining efforts to achieve food security. To address this issue, the United Nations (UN) set Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, which aims to halve food waste at the retail and consumer level by 2030 and reduce food loss in production and supply chains. Achieving this goal requires a comprehensive assessment of FLW and systematic data collection across all stages of the FSC. This dissertation develops and applies a framework for assessing FLW across the key stages of the Lithuanian FSC. The framework clearly defines FLW, determines the scope of the assessment, and establishes a methodological approach for measuring and analysing FLW based on primary data collection using questionnaire-based surveys in primary production, the food industry, and retail trade, as well as food waste diaries in households. The application of the developed framework delivers the first comprehensive FLW estimates for primary production, the food industry, and households in Lithuania, while also providing more precise food waste estimates for retail trade than previously available. The results show that estimates of food loss in primary production vary substantially across products, ranging from 0.1% for milk to 20.1% for beets. Environmental factors and stringent consumer or buyer standards are the main contributors to crop losses, while diseases represent the main cause of livestock losses. The food industry generates an estimated 10.9 thousand tonnes of edible food loss annually, corresponding to approximately 4 kg per capita, mainly due to inefficiencies in processing operations and product non-compliance with commercial standards. Retail trade generates 36.4 thousand tonnes of food waste each year, equivalent to about 13 kg per capita, largely driven by product expiration and spoilage. Household food waste averages 74.5 kg of edible food per capita per year, with common causes including spoilage, over-preparation, and over-serving. The estimates generated in this research establish a baseline for FLW across the key stages of the Lithuanian FSC, enabling monitoring of changes and supporting more refined and comparable assessments over time. They also provide an empirical basis for formulating and evaluating measures aimed at reducing FLW. Doctoral dissertation readers can search via VILNIUS TECH Virtual Library.
More