S. Čaikauskas, a Master of Architecture “The generation that does not aim for change is a poor generation”

July 2, 2020

Thanks to people who can generate ideas, are hard-working, resolute, and with critical thinking we can progress in different areas. Simonas Čaikauskas, a Master-degree in Architecture graduate of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) is one of them. When he was a student he was honoured with VGTU Emeritus Club scholarship.  We are talking to him about the profession that is not for everyone, his ambition to make Lithuanian architectural tradition well-known and the upcoming transition from the youth league. 
   
How did you come up with the choice to study architecture? Was your choice influenced by the desire to follow in the footsteps of your father Gintaras Čaikauskas who is an architect and a teacher?
  
My last name is constantly recognizable. There exists a common attitude that if you choose your father's profession, you will succeed not because of your talents and efforts, but because of the alleged help that your parent can provide.  Anyway, the last name also puts responsibility on you, it has a certain prehistory. 

Going back to the question how I came up with the choice to study architecture, I say I was just lucky. While still at school, parents kept asking me about my plans and future profession. I once said I would be an architect. Then, I was just eighth form school student and of course I didn’t really care much about any future profession, so I just blurted out the only better known profession. I guess it was a very natural answer, since I grew up among the building layouts and drawings, I played with the soldiers, which my dad used to cut out of cardboard, I built the cities from the Lego blocks. Dad tried to discourage me, but I was adamant. So, in the twelfth grade, I had no doubts what my studies were going to be. Besides, I had been attending preparatory courses for five years then. Thus, there was no retreat. From primary school onwards, I had an enhanced art profile at school. Perhaps, because of that I was attracted more to artistic professions. 

Did the studies live up to your expectations? Were they beneficial?

I think I took everything I could from my studies: I participated in exchange programmes, I visited foreign universities, I joined the Erasmus programme and went to study to Germany. If we compare the intellectual and teaching base in Lithuania and abroad the one in Lithuania is probably better. For example, when I studied at Technical University of Munich, which then ranked among top thirty world universities, I noticed that the university manipulated with the names of famous architects. Although they were on the University teachers list, I saw them at most three times a semester.  At VGTU, students are usually consulted by three experts in the field, who hold classes twice a week. People sometimes get fascinated by the fact that a university is among ten highest ranked universities of the world, however, my experience illustrates that the knowledge received in Lithuania is of the same high level and sometimes even surpasses the knowledge acquired abroad. 

You have just started your professional career and already have had quite a few appraisals.  Which ones are the most pleasing?

I hope the greatest achievements still lie ahead.  After all, the first steps are usually very big: at first, I didn’t even know how to draw on a computer, and then both graphic requirements and professionalism came out.  First-year works look just ridiculous, but then you realise that some progress has been made since you can see the mistakes you made then. During my studies, I was particularly successful in competitions: wherever I participated, I won. However, it is as in a basketball game: young players are leaders in their age group, but  they may not achieve any good results when they move to an adult group where they have to play with older professionals.  The same rule applies to architects. Therefore, after graduating from university, you need to draw a line and look ahead, compete both in the Lithuanian and global market.  You need to realize that there are quite a few people like you both in Lithuania and all over the world, and the number is growing every year.  After all, we have many examples of how successful students dissolve in the job market, while former poor students successfully pave the way for success. So, you can’t relax and feel like you’ve already achieved a lot. 

While being a student, you worked in an architecture studio. Wasn’t it hard to combine the two activities?

I can definitely say that master 's studies make you think. I am happy with my decision to continue studies in the second cycle after a one-year break. It is not always easy to combine studies and work, but it is really possible to do that and there is no need to be afraid. Also, the truth is that those who are always trying to reach the maximum, should not forget to care about their health, because there are many examples when people simply burn out. Balance is essential – everywhere.

What are your career ambitions?

My dream is to receive the most prestigious award in architecture – the Pritzker Prize. This is the so-called Nobel Prize in Architecture. But then you realise that only forty architects from all over the world have won this award so far. So, what happens if you do not get it?  Does it mean the end of everything? Does it mean that you have failed? I would really like to contribute to the shaping the face of Lithuanian architecture and present it to the world. 

 

Related news

Interdisciplinarity in practice: how Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system
Interdisciplinarity in practice: how Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system
Modern engineering solutions are increasingly created through collaboration between specialists from different fields. The university environment provides an opportunity to combine diverse competencies and develop solutions that would be difficult to achieve within the boundaries of a single discipline. Such collaboration was also at the heart of a bachelor’s thesis project in which VILNIUS TECH students Laura Venckutė (Faculty of Electronics) and Abderrazak El Aamrani (Faculty of Mechanics) combined expertise in electronics and medical engineering to develop a human motion recognition and evaluation system. From an Idea to Interdisciplinary Collaboration At the beginning of the project, students from the Medical Engineering and Electronics Engineering study programmes sought to address a problem relevant to both sports and rehabilitation: the lack of accessible systems capable of automatically evaluating human movements and providing immediate feedback. As the project authors point out, incorrect movements can reduce training effectiveness and increase the risk of injuries during rehabilitation, sports activities, or everyday tasks. For this reason, they decided to look for a technological solution that could help objectively assess movement quality. The idea emerged from previous projects and experience gained during their studies, while an important catalyst was the opportunity for collaboration proposed by their supervisors. From the outset, it was clear that the project would require expertise from different fields, as motion analysis involves not only developing a technical system but also defining meaningful criteria for evaluating human movement. [caption id="attachment_120707" align="alignnone" width="2048"] Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system[/caption] The students brought different, yet closely interconnected and complementary competencies to the project. The Electronics Engineering student was responsible for computer vision, embedded systems, and system integration, while the Medical Engineering student contributed expertise in biomechanics and human movement assessment. Although responsibilities were divided according to individual areas of expertise, key decisions were made collaboratively. From the Initial Concept to a Functional System In the early stages, the team planned to develop a system capable of analysing a broader range of movement patterns and performing more advanced analytical functions. However, as the project progressed, technical limitations, available hardware resources, and the scope of the bachelor’s thesis had to be taken into account. As a result, some ideas had to be abandoned. According to the team members, no major disagreements arose during the project. Decisions were made by discussing possible alternatives, evaluating how well they aligned with the project objectives, and, whenever possible, testing different approaches in practice. When technical and medical requirements conflicted, the team sought solutions that best balanced project goals and implementation constraints. The final outcome of the project is a human motion recognition and feedback system based on a pose estimation algorithm designed for basketball shooting analysis. The system detects a person in real time, estimates body posture, evaluates shooting technique according to biomechanical criteria, and subsequently provides feedback to the user. The Value of Interdisciplinarity and Future Opportunities During testing, the system performed better than expected. It successfully analysed the movements of users of different heights and maintained reliable performance at distances of up to 12 metres. According to the students, not only did the technical results exceed expectations, but the collaboration process itself also proved highly successful. In their view, such a project could theoretically be completed by a specialist from a single field. In practice, however, this would be difficult and inefficient. The project required both expertise in electronics and an understanding of human movement analysis. Without competencies from both fields, considerably more time would have been needed for learning unfamiliar topics and identifying appropriate solutions. Looking ahead, the students see opportunities to further develop the project by improving system stability, optimising resource usage, expanding the range of supported movement patterns, and increasing motion recognition accuracy. Although they are not yet certain whether they will continue working in this specific area, they hope to further deepen their expertise in related fields of technology and engineering. Supervisors’ Insights: Interdisciplinarity as a Foundation of Future Engineering The thesis supervisors emphasise that the nature of the project itself required collaboration across disciplines. However, the greatest value of the project lies not only in the technical solution that was developed, but also in the students’ ability to work together effectively. Professor Kristina Daunoravičienė, lecturer in the Medical Engineering study programme, notes that developing a human posture recognition and evaluation system requires both an understanding of human movement and biomechanics, as well as the ability to create a technical system capable of collecting, processing, and presenting information to the user. „The need for different knowledge and competencies made this topic an excellent platform for collaboration between Medical Engineering and Electronics Engineering students. Such projects foster not only technical solutions but also the ability to understand the logic, limitations, and priorities of other disciplines,“ says Prof. Dr Kristina Daunoravičienė. Although the students were initially unfamiliar with one another and came from different engineering backgrounds, a shared goal quickly became the foundation of successful cooperation. According to the supervisor, Medical Engineering contributed the perspective of human movement assessment and result interpretation, while Electronics Engineering provided expertise in system architecture, prototyping, and optimisation. According to Prof. Dr K. Daunoravičienė, the most important outcome of the project is not only the developed prototype and its comparison with the Xsens motion analysis system: „Equally important are the competencies of collaboration, communication, trust, initiative, and the ability to learn from one another. These are the qualities that allow good ideas to become real, functioning solutions.“ Associate Professor Dr Vytautas Abromavičius of the Faculty of Electronics also points out that in the era of artificial intelligence, technical expertise alone is no longer sufficient. Clear communication, the ability to understand specialists from different fields, and working together towards a common goal are becoming increasingly important. „This bachelor’s thesis demonstrated that our students communicated exceptionally well and were able to explain specialised professional terminology in a simple and understandable way. This mutual understanding enabled them to effectively combine knowledge from different disciplines and achieve an excellent result,“ says Assoc. Prof. Dr Vytautas Abromavičius. According to him, the need for interdisciplinary projects in modern engineering continues to grow. Every real-world product developed for the market consists of multiple interconnected components; therefore, a broader understanding of the problem leads to better product applicability and a more complete final outcome.
More
VILNIUS TECH Professor A. Čenys Represents Baltic States at Google Leadership Summit
VILNIUS TECH Professor A. Čenys Represents Baltic States at Google Leadership Summit
Prof. Antanas Čenys, a prominent researcher at VILNIUS TECH and the SustAInLivWork project, participated by personal invitation from Google in the exclusive Google for Education Higher Education Leader Series EMEA in London. Prof. Čenys was the only AI and cybersecurity expert from the Baltic countries to be personally invited to this high-level summit. The exclusive event brought together higher education leaders, technology pioneers, and innovation stakeholders from across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The summit focused on shaping the future of Artificial Intelligence, digital transformation, cybersecurity, and driving responsible innovation within the global academic and industrial landscapes. The insights and discussions from the London summit strongly resonate with the core mission of the SustAInLivWork project: strengthening Europe’s capacity to develop, deploy, and scale trustworthy AI solutions while simultaneously building the advanced skills, critical infrastructures, and innovation ecosystems required for a sustainable digital future. Through SustAInLivWork, VILNIUS TECH and its partners are actively delivering: An International AI Cluster: bridging the gap between research excellence, industry, and public sector stakeholders; Advanced Innovation Services: driving AI and data-driven solutions for various sectors; AI Skills Development: establishing lifelong learning opportunities and specialized training; Cross-Regional Collaboration: accelerating practical AI adoption and ensuring positive societal impact. The summit also underscored the rapidly growing importance of cybersecurity as a fundamental pillar for secure AI deployment. This focus perfectly aligns with ongoing initiatives led by VILNIUS TECH, including specialized cybersecurity skills development programmes supported by Google.org, aimed at strengthening digital resilience and cyber competence across Europe. As Europe accelerates its comprehensive AI transformation, structured collaboration between universities, industry leaders, policymakers, and major technology providers becomes increasingly paramount. SustAInLivWork and VILNIUS TECH remain committed to contributing to this evolutionary journey by building strong bridges between cutting-edge research, thriving innovation ecosystems, and sustainable societal progress.
More