VILNIUS TECH Professors Who Stood Vigil on January 13th: "A Universal Love Prevailed at That Time"

January 13, 2026

Although the passage of time wears away memories, often pushing them into complete oblivion, some past events are simply impossible to forget. The fateful events of January 1991 are precisely such an occasion. Even though 35 years have passed, it is impossible to forget, assert the VILNIUS TECH professors who stood guard at the country’s most important sites and agreed to share their memories on the Day of the Defenders of Freedom.

In January 1991, as the Soviet Union attempted to carry out a coup d’état in Lithuania, people from all over the country flocked to Vilnius to stand vigil at the capital’s most strategically important sites: the Supreme Council, the Government Palace, the Central Telegraph, the Intercity Telephone Exchange, the Radio and Television Committee, the TV Tower, and other buildings.

The community of VILNIUS TECH (then Vilnius Technical University, or VTU) contributed to the defense of freedom by guarding the Intercity Telephone Exchange, to which volunteer lecturers and students hurried from the nearby first building of VTU, as well as by standing guard at other sites.

Although the peaceful Lithuanian resistance helped defend Lithuania’s independence, it was marked by the blood of 14 compatriots, including the university’s student Rolandas Jankauskas. Nevertheless, these sacrifices and Lithuanian patriotism, according to VILNIUS TECH professors Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis, who were on duty at the Seimas, are immensely important: they play a fundamental role in Lithuania’s struggle for independence.

Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis: “A Universal Love Prevailed at That Time”

Prof. Habil. Dr. Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, President of the Council of the VILNIUS TECH Professors’ Emeritus Club, does not hide his feelings when recalling the events of that time—it was a grim and difficult period, yet even in the prevailing darkness, a light could be seen.

The professor, who was then the Vice-Rector for Studies at VTU, recounts that before January 13th, the university, like the entire country, was filled with an uplifting, hopeful mood, a fighting spirit, and a sense of unity.

“I could compare the bright side of that period to love or hate—you don’t know why those feelings come, how they come, or how long they last. At that time, a universal love prevailed—we passed it on to one another because we all thought the same way about the situation.

Although we knew how brutal this force was, that it could inflict great harm and spill blood, we thought everything would end well. No one expected such a terrible scenario and the use of repressive forces, but that’s exactly how it turned out,” shares Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis.

Even before the fateful night, the exam session for VTU students had been postponed, and volunteer vigils were organized at the Vilnius Intercity (long-distance) Telephone Exchange (Savanorių Ave. 28). However, no one officially planned mass vigils. The attitude was: whoever has the courage and desire can go; no one will stand in their way.

“I remember that on the evening of January 12th, around 10 PM, I was in Karoliniškės and passed the TV Tower by trolleybus—there was no sense of tension. Then I went to the Vilnius Intercity Telephone Exchange, where we were supposed to be on duty. The building was locked and surrounded by buses parked side-by-side—people had probably arrived in them from the Vilnius district or other cities. Since no one was allowed in, I went to the Radio and Television Committee building. There were a great many people there, probably from all over Lithuania—they were singing songs, lighting bonfires, and sharing sandwiches and drinks with each other. The atmosphere was very friendly and even cheerful,” shares the Professor Emeritus of the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.

At that time, it was impossible to predict that a tragedy would soon occur, so the professor returned home. However, upon seeing on television how paratroopers were seizing the Radio and Television Committee center, he and his son rushed to the Parliament and spent the entire, in his words, terrible night there. Although it wasn’t freezing, it was cold, so in the library, all the stairs were covered with people who had come inside to warm up. The defenders of the building asked people over loudspeakers to move away from the Parliament building, as the surrounding crowd was obstructing visibility and the planned defense.

“On the morning of January 13th, it was announced near the library that blood was urgently needed for transfusions for those injured at the TV Tower. A small bus arrived, but it filled up quickly, and my son and I couldn’t get in. Since we were from Antakalnis, we took a trolleybus to Žolyno Street and walked to the blood transfusion center,” the President of the Council of the Professors’ Emeritus Club shares his memories.

At that time, every person’s role and contribution to defending freedom was important. According to him, the faculties themselves also planned to stand guard at strategically important sites on their own initiative. The Faculty of Mechanics, located on Basanavičiaus Street, was assigned to guard the Parliament. The professor himself guarded it and other sites for several nights.

He recalls that the staff organizers from the Faculties of Mechanics and Transport Engineering—Rimantas Garbinčius, Stasys Glebus, Leonas Vičiulis, and many other university employees—were particularly active at the university.

We can be proud not only of them but of all Lithuanians and residents of Lithuania, because one might never experience such determination and unity as existed then in a lifetime.

“For example, if there had been an attack on the telephone exchange, those unarmed students could have done nothing. It was more about moral support—the employees felt calmer knowing they were not alone. It was a common goal and struggle for Lithuania. If a national crisis were to arise today, would there be the same spirit that existed then? Would unarmed people again surround the Parliament with their bodies? That feeling of striving for independence was very deep, broad, and united all of Lithuania at that time,” says Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis. “It is likely that this determination remains among the people, but government institutions should not just blame each other, but rather stop the petty squabbling and unite in the face of growing threats.”

Prof. Dr. Alfonsas Daniūnas: “The Sacrifices Played an Important Role on Our Path to Independence”

Also on duty at the Supreme Council–Reconstituent Seimas in January 1991 was Prof. Dr. Alfonsas Daniūnas, Chairman of the VILNIUS TECH Senate and former Rector, who was then a young lecturer at the Faculty of Civil Engineering, having recently started as an associate professor in the Department of Metal and Composite Structures. He does not hide the fact that although many small details of the events have slowly faded from memory over 35 years, the unity he witnessed both at the university and throughout the state is impossible to forget.

“The members of the community were united, patriotic, and determined to preserve independence. Of course, the university is a large organization, so there were people with different views, but overall, a sense of calm and focus prevailed. The people here are educated, enlightened, and have a strong spirit,” he shares.

Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and a few colleagues were living in a university dormitory in Žirmūnai at the time, so they often saw the fenced-off area in the Šiaurės miestelis (Northern Town) district where military units were stationed. This gradually began to cause increasing anxiety, which intensified on January 8th, when the pro-Soviet organization ‘Yedinstvo’ tried to force its way into the Seimas.

“We felt that something might happen, although we hoped nothing terrible would occur. From that evening on, we went to the Seimas for eight consecutive days. At first, we just stood guard, watched, and listened for information, but later, news began to spread that the situation might worsen,” the professor recounts.

Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and his colleagues were on duty at the Seimas on the evening of January 12th and during the fateful night of the 13th. He recalls that although Independence Square was packed, the number of people kept growing.

“The unity of the people was enormous, and the mood was uplifting and positive—everyone was determined to defend the sites. However, on the night of January 13th, the tension rose. Tanks and armored vehicles began moving towards the TV Tower, as reported by the Seimas. Even here, we heard muffled shots coming from Karoliniškės. Later, it was announced through a window that there were casualties, and we saw ambulances driving by,” he says.

According to Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas, a huge problem was the lack of information—since there were no mobile phones, people received news through loudspeakers or by word of mouth. What had actually happened at the TV Tower was still unknown at the time, but the crowd felt immense fear—they thought the Soviet soldiers would soon move towards the Seimas.

“The logic is simple: during a coup, you seize communication channels, in this case, radio and television, you occupy the bank and the government. Why didn’t they dare to attack the Seimas? Perhaps their plans changed. However, I believe the huge crowd of people was the decisive factor. I am glad we went specifically to the Seimas—I feel it was the right step, even though our contribution was modest. If they had attacked the Seimas, I think there would have been many more casualties—there was simply nowhere to go,” recalls Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas.

On January 13th, he and his colleagues returned to stand guard at the Seimas, where the building was being reinforced with rebar, and bonfires blazed in Independence Square. However, the number of people was gradually decreasing—the immediate threat was subsiding, and a crowd of thousands was gathering at the Palace of Sports, where a commemoration for the 14 fallen Defenders of Freedom was being held.

“It is a great tragedy for those who died, among them our university’s Faculty of Electronics student, Rolandas Jankauskas, whose memory was later immortalized with a memorial plaque. I remember that funeral, the lying-in-state at the Palace of Sports—it was a huge shock to the entire nation, which showed how people can unite. I have only seen such unity once in my life, because, thank God, we have not had any more crises that terrible.

That’s how it is in history—when people die, major changes and historical turning points occur. Those sacrifices are very important on our path to independence. At that time, we were all just doing what we thought was necessary—we were where the fate of the state was being decided,” states Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas.

Galerija

Related news

Interdisciplinarity in practice: how Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system
Interdisciplinarity in practice: how Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system
Modern engineering solutions are increasingly created through collaboration between specialists from different fields. The university environment provides an opportunity to combine diverse competencies and develop solutions that would be difficult to achieve within the boundaries of a single discipline. Such collaboration was also at the heart of a bachelor’s thesis project in which VILNIUS TECH students Laura Venckutė (Faculty of Electronics) and Abderrazak El Aamrani (Faculty of Mechanics) combined expertise in electronics and medical engineering to develop a human motion recognition and evaluation system. From an Idea to Interdisciplinary Collaboration At the beginning of the project, students from the Medical Engineering and Electronics Engineering study programmes sought to address a problem relevant to both sports and rehabilitation: the lack of accessible systems capable of automatically evaluating human movements and providing immediate feedback. As the project authors point out, incorrect movements can reduce training effectiveness and increase the risk of injuries during rehabilitation, sports activities, or everyday tasks. For this reason, they decided to look for a technological solution that could help objectively assess movement quality. The idea emerged from previous projects and experience gained during their studies, while an important catalyst was the opportunity for collaboration proposed by their supervisors. From the outset, it was clear that the project would require expertise from different fields, as motion analysis involves not only developing a technical system but also defining meaningful criteria for evaluating human movement. [caption id="attachment_120707" align="alignnone" width="2048"] Electronics and Medical Engineering students developed a Human motion analysis system[/caption] The students brought different, yet closely interconnected and complementary competencies to the project. The Electronics Engineering student was responsible for computer vision, embedded systems, and system integration, while the Medical Engineering student contributed expertise in biomechanics and human movement assessment. Although responsibilities were divided according to individual areas of expertise, key decisions were made collaboratively. From the Initial Concept to a Functional System In the early stages, the team planned to develop a system capable of analysing a broader range of movement patterns and performing more advanced analytical functions. However, as the project progressed, technical limitations, available hardware resources, and the scope of the bachelor’s thesis had to be taken into account. As a result, some ideas had to be abandoned. According to the team members, no major disagreements arose during the project. Decisions were made by discussing possible alternatives, evaluating how well they aligned with the project objectives, and, whenever possible, testing different approaches in practice. When technical and medical requirements conflicted, the team sought solutions that best balanced project goals and implementation constraints. The final outcome of the project is a human motion recognition and feedback system based on a pose estimation algorithm designed for basketball shooting analysis. The system detects a person in real time, estimates body posture, evaluates shooting technique according to biomechanical criteria, and subsequently provides feedback to the user. The Value of Interdisciplinarity and Future Opportunities During testing, the system performed better than expected. It successfully analysed the movements of users of different heights and maintained reliable performance at distances of up to 12 metres. According to the students, not only did the technical results exceed expectations, but the collaboration process itself also proved highly successful. In their view, such a project could theoretically be completed by a specialist from a single field. In practice, however, this would be difficult and inefficient. The project required both expertise in electronics and an understanding of human movement analysis. Without competencies from both fields, considerably more time would have been needed for learning unfamiliar topics and identifying appropriate solutions. Looking ahead, the students see opportunities to further develop the project by improving system stability, optimising resource usage, expanding the range of supported movement patterns, and increasing motion recognition accuracy. Although they are not yet certain whether they will continue working in this specific area, they hope to further deepen their expertise in related fields of technology and engineering. Supervisors’ Insights: Interdisciplinarity as a Foundation of Future Engineering The thesis supervisors emphasise that the nature of the project itself required collaboration across disciplines. However, the greatest value of the project lies not only in the technical solution that was developed, but also in the students’ ability to work together effectively. Professor Kristina Daunoravičienė, lecturer in the Medical Engineering study programme, notes that developing a human posture recognition and evaluation system requires both an understanding of human movement and biomechanics, as well as the ability to create a technical system capable of collecting, processing, and presenting information to the user. „The need for different knowledge and competencies made this topic an excellent platform for collaboration between Medical Engineering and Electronics Engineering students. Such projects foster not only technical solutions but also the ability to understand the logic, limitations, and priorities of other disciplines,“ says Prof. Dr Kristina Daunoravičienė. Although the students were initially unfamiliar with one another and came from different engineering backgrounds, a shared goal quickly became the foundation of successful cooperation. According to the supervisor, Medical Engineering contributed the perspective of human movement assessment and result interpretation, while Electronics Engineering provided expertise in system architecture, prototyping, and optimisation. According to Prof. Dr K. Daunoravičienė, the most important outcome of the project is not only the developed prototype and its comparison with the Xsens motion analysis system: „Equally important are the competencies of collaboration, communication, trust, initiative, and the ability to learn from one another. These are the qualities that allow good ideas to become real, functioning solutions.“ Associate Professor Dr Vytautas Abromavičius of the Faculty of Electronics also points out that in the era of artificial intelligence, technical expertise alone is no longer sufficient. Clear communication, the ability to understand specialists from different fields, and working together towards a common goal are becoming increasingly important. „This bachelor’s thesis demonstrated that our students communicated exceptionally well and were able to explain specialised professional terminology in a simple and understandable way. This mutual understanding enabled them to effectively combine knowledge from different disciplines and achieve an excellent result,“ says Assoc. Prof. Dr Vytautas Abromavičius. According to him, the need for interdisciplinary projects in modern engineering continues to grow. Every real-world product developed for the market consists of multiple interconnected components; therefore, a broader understanding of the problem leads to better product applicability and a more complete final outcome.
More
VILNIUS TECH Professor A. Čenys Represents Baltic States at Google Leadership Summit
VILNIUS TECH Professor A. Čenys Represents Baltic States at Google Leadership Summit
Prof. Antanas Čenys, a prominent researcher at VILNIUS TECH and the SustAInLivWork project, participated by personal invitation from Google in the exclusive Google for Education Higher Education Leader Series EMEA in London. Prof. Čenys was the only AI and cybersecurity expert from the Baltic countries to be personally invited to this high-level summit. The exclusive event brought together higher education leaders, technology pioneers, and innovation stakeholders from across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The summit focused on shaping the future of Artificial Intelligence, digital transformation, cybersecurity, and driving responsible innovation within the global academic and industrial landscapes. The insights and discussions from the London summit strongly resonate with the core mission of the SustAInLivWork project: strengthening Europe’s capacity to develop, deploy, and scale trustworthy AI solutions while simultaneously building the advanced skills, critical infrastructures, and innovation ecosystems required for a sustainable digital future. Through SustAInLivWork, VILNIUS TECH and its partners are actively delivering: An International AI Cluster: bridging the gap between research excellence, industry, and public sector stakeholders; Advanced Innovation Services: driving AI and data-driven solutions for various sectors; AI Skills Development: establishing lifelong learning opportunities and specialized training; Cross-Regional Collaboration: accelerating practical AI adoption and ensuring positive societal impact. The summit also underscored the rapidly growing importance of cybersecurity as a fundamental pillar for secure AI deployment. This focus perfectly aligns with ongoing initiatives led by VILNIUS TECH, including specialized cybersecurity skills development programmes supported by Google.org, aimed at strengthening digital resilience and cyber competence across Europe. As Europe accelerates its comprehensive AI transformation, structured collaboration between universities, industry leaders, policymakers, and major technology providers becomes increasingly paramount. SustAInLivWork and VILNIUS TECH remain committed to contributing to this evolutionary journey by building strong bridges between cutting-edge research, thriving innovation ecosystems, and sustainable societal progress.
More