VILNIUS TECH Professors Who Stood Vigil on January 13th: "A Universal Love Prevailed at That Time"

January 13, 2026

Although the passage of time wears away memories, often pushing them into complete oblivion, some past events are simply impossible to forget. The fateful events of January 1991 are precisely such an occasion. Even though 35 years have passed, it is impossible to forget, assert the VILNIUS TECH professors who stood guard at the country’s most important sites and agreed to share their memories on the Day of the Defenders of Freedom.

In January 1991, as the Soviet Union attempted to carry out a coup d’état in Lithuania, people from all over the country flocked to Vilnius to stand vigil at the capital’s most strategically important sites: the Supreme Council, the Government Palace, the Central Telegraph, the Intercity Telephone Exchange, the Radio and Television Committee, the TV Tower, and other buildings.

The community of VILNIUS TECH (then Vilnius Technical University, or VTU) contributed to the defense of freedom by guarding the Intercity Telephone Exchange, to which volunteer lecturers and students hurried from the nearby first building of VTU, as well as by standing guard at other sites.

Although the peaceful Lithuanian resistance helped defend Lithuania’s independence, it was marked by the blood of 14 compatriots, including the university’s student Rolandas Jankauskas. Nevertheless, these sacrifices and Lithuanian patriotism, according to VILNIUS TECH professors Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis, who were on duty at the Seimas, are immensely important: they play a fundamental role in Lithuania’s struggle for independence.

Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis: “A Universal Love Prevailed at That Time”

Prof. Habil. Dr. Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, President of the Council of the VILNIUS TECH Professors’ Emeritus Club, does not hide his feelings when recalling the events of that time—it was a grim and difficult period, yet even in the prevailing darkness, a light could be seen.

The professor, who was then the Vice-Rector for Studies at VTU, recounts that before January 13th, the university, like the entire country, was filled with an uplifting, hopeful mood, a fighting spirit, and a sense of unity.

“I could compare the bright side of that period to love or hate—you don’t know why those feelings come, how they come, or how long they last. At that time, a universal love prevailed—we passed it on to one another because we all thought the same way about the situation.

Although we knew how brutal this force was, that it could inflict great harm and spill blood, we thought everything would end well. No one expected such a terrible scenario and the use of repressive forces, but that’s exactly how it turned out,” shares Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis.

Even before the fateful night, the exam session for VTU students had been postponed, and volunteer vigils were organized at the Vilnius Intercity (long-distance) Telephone Exchange (Savanorių Ave. 28). However, no one officially planned mass vigils. The attitude was: whoever has the courage and desire can go; no one will stand in their way.

“I remember that on the evening of January 12th, around 10 PM, I was in Karoliniškės and passed the TV Tower by trolleybus—there was no sense of tension. Then I went to the Vilnius Intercity Telephone Exchange, where we were supposed to be on duty. The building was locked and surrounded by buses parked side-by-side—people had probably arrived in them from the Vilnius district or other cities. Since no one was allowed in, I went to the Radio and Television Committee building. There were a great many people there, probably from all over Lithuania—they were singing songs, lighting bonfires, and sharing sandwiches and drinks with each other. The atmosphere was very friendly and even cheerful,” shares the Professor Emeritus of the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.

At that time, it was impossible to predict that a tragedy would soon occur, so the professor returned home. However, upon seeing on television how paratroopers were seizing the Radio and Television Committee center, he and his son rushed to the Parliament and spent the entire, in his words, terrible night there. Although it wasn’t freezing, it was cold, so in the library, all the stairs were covered with people who had come inside to warm up. The defenders of the building asked people over loudspeakers to move away from the Parliament building, as the surrounding crowd was obstructing visibility and the planned defense.

“On the morning of January 13th, it was announced near the library that blood was urgently needed for transfusions for those injured at the TV Tower. A small bus arrived, but it filled up quickly, and my son and I couldn’t get in. Since we were from Antakalnis, we took a trolleybus to Žolyno Street and walked to the blood transfusion center,” the President of the Council of the Professors’ Emeritus Club shares his memories.

At that time, every person’s role and contribution to defending freedom was important. According to him, the faculties themselves also planned to stand guard at strategically important sites on their own initiative. The Faculty of Mechanics, located on Basanavičiaus Street, was assigned to guard the Parliament. The professor himself guarded it and other sites for several nights.

He recalls that the staff organizers from the Faculties of Mechanics and Transport Engineering—Rimantas Garbinčius, Stasys Glebus, Leonas Vičiulis, and many other university employees—were particularly active at the university.

We can be proud not only of them but of all Lithuanians and residents of Lithuania, because one might never experience such determination and unity as existed then in a lifetime.

“For example, if there had been an attack on the telephone exchange, those unarmed students could have done nothing. It was more about moral support—the employees felt calmer knowing they were not alone. It was a common goal and struggle for Lithuania. If a national crisis were to arise today, would there be the same spirit that existed then? Would unarmed people again surround the Parliament with their bodies? That feeling of striving for independence was very deep, broad, and united all of Lithuania at that time,” says Prof. Habil. Dr. A. V. Valiulis. “It is likely that this determination remains among the people, but government institutions should not just blame each other, but rather stop the petty squabbling and unite in the face of growing threats.”

Prof. Dr. Alfonsas Daniūnas: “The Sacrifices Played an Important Role on Our Path to Independence”

Also on duty at the Supreme Council–Reconstituent Seimas in January 1991 was Prof. Dr. Alfonsas Daniūnas, Chairman of the VILNIUS TECH Senate and former Rector, who was then a young lecturer at the Faculty of Civil Engineering, having recently started as an associate professor in the Department of Metal and Composite Structures. He does not hide the fact that although many small details of the events have slowly faded from memory over 35 years, the unity he witnessed both at the university and throughout the state is impossible to forget.

“The members of the community were united, patriotic, and determined to preserve independence. Of course, the university is a large organization, so there were people with different views, but overall, a sense of calm and focus prevailed. The people here are educated, enlightened, and have a strong spirit,” he shares.

Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and a few colleagues were living in a university dormitory in Žirmūnai at the time, so they often saw the fenced-off area in the Šiaurės miestelis (Northern Town) district where military units were stationed. This gradually began to cause increasing anxiety, which intensified on January 8th, when the pro-Soviet organization ‘Yedinstvo’ tried to force its way into the Seimas.

“We felt that something might happen, although we hoped nothing terrible would occur. From that evening on, we went to the Seimas for eight consecutive days. At first, we just stood guard, watched, and listened for information, but later, news began to spread that the situation might worsen,” the professor recounts.

Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas and his colleagues were on duty at the Seimas on the evening of January 12th and during the fateful night of the 13th. He recalls that although Independence Square was packed, the number of people kept growing.

“The unity of the people was enormous, and the mood was uplifting and positive—everyone was determined to defend the sites. However, on the night of January 13th, the tension rose. Tanks and armored vehicles began moving towards the TV Tower, as reported by the Seimas. Even here, we heard muffled shots coming from Karoliniškės. Later, it was announced through a window that there were casualties, and we saw ambulances driving by,” he says.

According to Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas, a huge problem was the lack of information—since there were no mobile phones, people received news through loudspeakers or by word of mouth. What had actually happened at the TV Tower was still unknown at the time, but the crowd felt immense fear—they thought the Soviet soldiers would soon move towards the Seimas.

“The logic is simple: during a coup, you seize communication channels, in this case, radio and television, you occupy the bank and the government. Why didn’t they dare to attack the Seimas? Perhaps their plans changed. However, I believe the huge crowd of people was the decisive factor. I am glad we went specifically to the Seimas—I feel it was the right step, even though our contribution was modest. If they had attacked the Seimas, I think there would have been many more casualties—there was simply nowhere to go,” recalls Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas.

On January 13th, he and his colleagues returned to stand guard at the Seimas, where the building was being reinforced with rebar, and bonfires blazed in Independence Square. However, the number of people was gradually decreasing—the immediate threat was subsiding, and a crowd of thousands was gathering at the Palace of Sports, where a commemoration for the 14 fallen Defenders of Freedom was being held.

“It is a great tragedy for those who died, among them our university’s Faculty of Electronics student, Rolandas Jankauskas, whose memory was later immortalized with a memorial plaque. I remember that funeral, the lying-in-state at the Palace of Sports—it was a huge shock to the entire nation, which showed how people can unite. I have only seen such unity once in my life, because, thank God, we have not had any more crises that terrible.

That’s how it is in history—when people die, major changes and historical turning points occur. Those sacrifices are very important on our path to independence. At that time, we were all just doing what we thought was necessary—we were where the fate of the state was being decided,” states Prof. Dr. A. Daniūnas.

Galerija

Related news

New doctoral dissertation
New doctoral dissertation
VILNIUS TECH Library invites you to follow the published new dissertations. The dissertation „Investigation of recurrent neural networks-based methods for early fault detection and short-term power forecasting in wind energy applications“ prepared at VILNIUS TECH by Mindaugas Jankauskas. The dissertation was prepared in 2021–2026. Scientific consultant – Prof. Dr Artūras Serackis. The dissertation was defended at the public meeting of the Dissertation Defence Council of the Scientific Field of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in the Aula Doctoralis Meeting Hall of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University at 10 a. m. on 5 June 2026. The increasing role of wind energy in modern power systems creates a growing need for reliable turbine operation, accurate short-term power forecasting, and computationally efficient data-driven methods. This dissertation addresses two related problems: early fault detection in wind turbines using supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) time-series data, and short-term wind farm power forecasting using meteorological forecasts. The dissertation aims to develop and investigate data-driven methods that improve the accuracy, efficiency, and practical applicability of short-term wind power forecasting and early wind turbine fault detection using SCADA and meteorological forecast data. The first part of the dissertation develops and investigates a virtual-sensor-based method for condition monitoring and early fault detection in wind turbines using SCADA time-series data, including the selection of the most informative features and the evaluation of factors affecting prediction accuracy. The second part of the dissertation analyzes and optimizes recurrent neural-network structures for the virtual sensor by evaluating feature-sequence formation, training schemes, and alternative activation functions to increase accuracy and reduce the computational cost relevant for practical deployment. The third part of the dissertation develops and investigates a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) based method for short-term wind farm power forecasting using meteorological forecast data, and evaluates the impact of different numerical weather prediction (NWP) sources and the suitability of an objective function with a normalized Nord Pool price multiplier for day-ahead energy production forecasts. The dissertation contributes to the fields of wind energy and artificial intelligence by proposing and validating data-driven methods for virtual sensing, residual-based early fault detection, recurrent-model optimization, computationally efficient activation-function selection, and economically meaningful short-term wind power forecasting. The research results have been published in three peer-reviewed scientific journals and one conference proceeding, and were presented at seven conferences and seminars. Doctoral dissertation readers can search via VILNIUS TECH Virtual Library.
More
Geopolitics is changing design priorities: infrastructure must withstand explosions too
Geopolitics is changing design priorities: infrastructure must withstand explosions too
Until recently, buildings were primarily designed to withstand conventional loads such as wind, snow, and everyday use. However, geopolitical developments in Europe and around the world are changing perspectives in Lithuania as well: the resilience of infrastructure to extreme scenarios, such as explosions, is becoming an integral part of the design process. Dr. Povilas Dabrila, a junior researcher at the Department of Steel and Composite Structures of the Faculty of Civil Engineering at VILNIUS TECH University, says that explosions are a rare but high-consequence threat, and traditional design approaches do not always account for such scenarios. [caption id="attachment_115773" align="alignnone" width="2560"] Povilas Dabrila[/caption] “The war in Ukraine has forced us to rethink many things. One of them is how we design, maintain, and protect infrastructure. For a long time, we focused mainly on conventional impacts: snow, wind, operational loads on buildings and bridges, and energy efficiency. Today, however, it is clear that infrastructure may also face far more dangerous scenarios, such as explosions or vehicle impacts,” he explains. According to him, infrastructure becomes even more important during crises, as people’s safety may depend on it. “Bridges, roads, buildings, energy facilities, and communication networks are essential not only for everyday life. If a bridge collapses or communications fail during a crisis, emergency assistance may not arrive in time. This is no longer merely a technical loss—it can cost lives. Therefore, infrastructure resilience today is not just an engineering issue; it is also a matter of public safety, crisis preparedness, and national resilience,” emphasizes Dabrila. What happens during an explosion? The researcher explains that the effect of an explosion on structures differs fundamentally from conventional loads. “An explosion affects a building extremely suddenly. A blast wave forms and, within a very short time, transfers significant pressure to the façade, windows, walls, and floors. What distinguishes an explosion from other challenging conditions is the duration of its impact. Snow loads a structure gradually over a long period, and even wind is not as sudden as an explosion. In the case of an explosion, the impact is felt almost instantly.” As a result, structures respond differently as well. “The key question is not only whether an element can withstand the load. What also matters is how it behaves under dynamic loading—how it deforms and whether it maintains its integrity.” According to Dabrila, explosions often first damage weaker elements such as windows, façade components, and non-load-bearing walls. The greatest risk arises when load-bearing elements are damaged, leading to more extensive structural failures. In such cases, collapse may occur. “In rare cases, localized damage can trigger a much larger collapse. For example, if a single column is damaged, internal forces are redistributed to other elements, which may also fail, causing the collapse to spread further. It is important to note that such situations are rare in ordinary buildings. Buildings are designed with safety margins, and regulations require the evaluation of structural safety and reliability.” Reducing the impact is essential According to Dabrila, blast resistance requires a comprehensive approach: both the resilience of the structure itself and measures that either increase the distance between the explosion and the building or reduce the impact of the blast. “A building’s resistance to explosions does not depend solely on stronger walls or columns. It is a system-wide issue: how the building is designed, how it behaves when damaged, and what additional measures reduce the impact before it reaches the structure. From a structural perspective, the most important thing is sufficient load-bearing capacity. If a column, beam, slab, or connection is damaged, internal forces should be able to redistribute to other structural elements. Then the failure of one element does not necessarily lead to the collapse of the entire structure.” It is also important to understand how the structure behaves under sudden loads. Explosion loads are extremely intense and short-lived, so engineers must evaluate not only whether a component can withstand the load but also how it deforms and whether the structure retains its integrity. Equally important are measures that reduce the impact itself. “These may include standoff distances, earth berms, concrete barriers, additional protective structures, screens, or nets. Their purpose is to move the threat farther away, block direct impact, or absorb part of the energy so that it does not reach the primary structure. We can see practical examples in Ukraine. The country employs various protective solutions, ranging from additional structural elements to protective nets that reduce the risk of direct drone strikes or other impacts.” How blast resistance is achieved According to Dabrila, designing structures that are more resistant to explosions involves solutions at several levels — from reducing the impact itself to strengthening the structure. “The first goal is to reduce the impact before it reaches the building. This can be achieved through standoff distances, concrete blocks, earth berms, barriers, protective fences, anti-drone nets, or additional structural installations. At the same time, the most critical structural components — columns, slabs, walls, and connections — are strengthened. This can be done using steel, reinforced concrete, composite materials, or additional bracing.” Energy-absorbing systems are also used, including protective panels, multilayer façades, and composite modules. Their purpose is to absorb part of the blast energy and reduce damage to the primary structure. According to Dabrila, digital technologies make it possible to evaluate potential scenarios in advance. “Modeling is also extremely important. Today, numerical models allow us to evaluate how a building or its individual elements would behave during an explosion, impact, or another extreme event. This enables us to base decisions on calculations and testing rather than assumptions. In the future, I believe we will see more lightweight, easily installable protective systems — for example, multilayer composite modules that can be used to protect existing buildings and infrastructure.” Science is seeking practical solutions Dabrila explains that research in this field is focused not only on theory but also on practical applications in infrastructure design. The Faculty of Civil Engineering at VILNIUS TECH studies how structures and materials behave under complex loading conditions. “Our research focuses on structural resistance to extreme loads and the development of lightweight multilayer composite systems. We are looking for solutions that could provide additional protection for buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure against impacts, blast waves, high temperatures, and similar threats. One area of research involves protective composite modules that could be installed on existing structures and serve as an additional protective layer.” According to him, both the materials and their internal structure are important. “Different layers, materials, and internal geometries can be combined, including energy-absorbing structures. The goal is to make the protection as lightweight as possible while maximizing energy absorption.” Experimental testing conducted at the faculty helps researchers understand the real behavior of materials, while numerical modeling allows this knowledge to be applied on a larger scale. “Through testing, we observe how materials actually deform and fail. Modeling allows us to scale those results up — for example, evaluating not only a small specimen but also a structural component or a real-world structure. Such research is important because it can lead to practical recommendations: which materials to choose, what layer configurations to use, how to attach protective modules, and where protection would provide the greatest benefit.” The goal is to control damage Dabrila stresses that it is impossible to make buildings completely resistant to explosions. Everything depends on the size of the explosion, the distance from the blast, the building’s structural system, the surrounding environment, and how the impact reaches the building. “The primary objective is usually not to make a building ‘indestructible’ but to control the damage. This means setting clear priorities. The most important goals are protecting people, preventing sudden collapse, reducing damage, and, if possible, maintaining critical functions.” In Dabrila’s view, assessing infrastructure resilience against extreme scenarios has not yet become common practice in Lithuania. Explosions and other extreme scenarios are typically considered only for specific types of facilities. However, changing circumstances are also changing design priorities. “There is increasing discussion about civil protection, critical infrastructure security, and the resilience of facilities under crisis conditions. As a result, this topic is gradually moving from a narrow specialist field into a broader engineering and national security issue.” He notes that much still depends on the client’s perspective. “Such solutions often involve additional costs, while their benefits become apparent only during a crisis. As a result, it can be difficult to justify the investment, especially when the primary focus is minimizing construction costs.” Nevertheless, he believes that building resilience should be viewed not as an extra expense but as a risk management measure. “Resilience is not a luxury — it is risk management. Not every project requires the most expensive solutions, but critical facilities should be subject to higher standards. Sometimes even simple measures — better site planning, protective barriers, or strengthening critical structural elements—can significantly reduce risk.” In his opinion, infrastructure security will increasingly be viewed as part of national resilience. “Whether such solutions become a standard part of the design process will depend on clients’ attitudes and on clear requirements and methodologies. Designers need to know when such scenarios must be assessed and how to evaluate them. I believe that, at least for critical infrastructure, such assessments should become standard practice. Not every building requires the same level of protection, but the most important facilities should be designed with extreme scenarios in mind.”
More