Lithuanian Science and Business at MIT: From Academic Rigor to Real-World Solutions

April 15, 2026

Between March 16 and 20 this year a delegation from the Lithuanian Consortium for Engagement with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) carried out its third strategic visit to the United States. The group brought together representatives from Lithuanian universities, research institutes, and businesses, continuing efforts to deepen collaboration with one of the world’s leading innovation ecosystems. VILNIUS TECH was represented by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Audrius Grainys of the Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electronics.

This year’s spring was full of new experiences for the transatlantic science and innovation community. A delegation with 18 members from 13 partnering science and business institutions of Lithuanian Consortium traveled to the world’s leading university to discuss further plans for joint research and projects.

The visit agenda combined joint and individual meetings with MIT representatives. In parallel, the delegation engaged directly with MIT’s academic environment, attending classes, thesis defenses, and midterm project reviews of students at MIT schools and DesignX, dedicated to design innovation and entrepreneurship. These experiences provided first-hand insight into how MIT structures its learning process around active participation and real-world problem-solving.

Reflecting on the visit, Professor Elizabeth Wood—founding director of the MIT-Ukraine Program and co-director of the MIT-Eurasia Program at the MIT Center for International Studies (CIS) —emphasized both the scope of these CIS-affiliated programs and the value of direct exchange:

It was wonderful to have our Lithuanian colleagues from the Consortium visit MIT the week of March 16 as spring was just arriving. We were able to have excellent visits to many facilities at MIT, including meeting with the Vice Provost for International Activities, Duane Boning, and with the head of all the MIT libraries, Chris Bourg.

The visit explored concrete ways to bring researchers and industry closer together, especially how to turn scientific ideas into real products and solutions.

From Process to Impact

Throughout the visit one idea kept coming up repeatedly: research and education are increasingly being judged by the real-world impact they create. According to Professor Wood, the conversations pointed to real changes already happening across Lithuanian universities:

This visit helped me to clarify some of the fascinating directions that Lithuanian leaders in academia and industry are discussing, including moving to modernize and innovate in research and education.

She also pointed to the importance of stronger collaboration between science and business, as well as more practice-oriented teaching models:

I was intrigued by the discussion of building more ties between academia and industry so there can be more mutual support. Some MIT models of teaching that orient courses toward concrete proposals of tasks from the business community might be useful here.

These insights were further reflected in conversations between Lithuanian and MIT representatives. Ina Žurkuvienė, the coordinator of the Lithuanian Consortium, elaborated:

At MIT, there is a strong focus on how research contributes to real change in the world. Their portfolios are built around projects, inventions, and technologies. It raises an important question for us in Lithuania – what if we started measuring success more by impact than by process? While high-quality publications remain a cornerstone of science, broadening our criteria to value real-world outcomes alongside traditional metrics would allow a more holistic appreciation of a scientist’s contribution.

At the same time, it was emphasized that such approaches require careful adaptation to national and European contexts rather than direct replication.

The delegation met with possible partners to discuss these shifts, including Prof. Dr. Phillip Budden—who recently visited Lithuania—and Prof. Dr. Fiona Murray, Vice Chair of the NATO Innovation Fund. Their discussions focused on exploring future avenues for collaboration.

Learning How Innovation Moves Through the Role of MIT Centers

To better understand how ideas move from laboratories to the market, the delegation visited several MIT units, including the Deshpande Center for Technological Innovation.

There, discussions with Executive Director Rana K. Gupta highlighted a highly selective commercialization model. Each year, the center reviews dozens of research proposals but supports only a small number of projects with strong potential for real-world application. A big part of this process relies on ‘Catalysts’ – experienced scientists who work side by side with researchers to test ideas, spot risks early, and help move projects toward the market.

The Consortium’s coordinator stressed that this approach only works when there is a genuine trust between researchers and the people helping bring their ideas to market:

That trust comes from shared experience – without it, even the best tools or processes are not enough.

One more insightful visit was to the MIT Teaching and Learning Lab. It highlighted an approach to education focused on active learning. It was noted that students are expected to engage with theoretical material independently before class, while in-person time is dedicated to discussion, teamwork, and solving real-world challenges. This model is reinforced across MIT through early involvement in team-based projects, close collaboration with faculty and industry, and access to entrepreneurship platforms such as MIT DesignX, combining practical application with a strong interdisciplinary academic foundation.

Testing Ideas in Practice

The delegation also visited the MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, one of the few university-based research reactors in the world. The facility enables advanced materials testing under extreme conditions, significantly accelerating research processes and supporting collaboration with industry partners developing next-generation energy technologies.

Another important stop was at the Lithuanian-founded biotechnology company Northway Biotech in Waltham, Massachusetts. The tour of modern laboratories highlighted how the manufacturing technologies for biological medicinal products are developed and medicinal products are produced for clinical trials.

The new member of the Consortium is continuing talks with Lithuanian Science institutions about a possible collaboration for building the joint Research and Innovation Centre for biotechnologies. The Center is primarily defined by its explicit focus on dual-use research. Idea was presented in a meeting with Prof. Dr. Robert Desimone, Dr. J. Christopher Love, Prof. Dr. Michael J. Cima, Prof. Dr. Hadley Sikes who was a guest speaker at the conference Human and More than Human Futures organized by the Lithuanian Consortium last October.

Building the Momentum

The engagement between Lithuanian institutions and MIT is already yielding concrete results. In the first year of collaboration, Lithuanian participants submitted seven MIT Global Seed Funds applications—administered through CIS—together with MIT researchers.

Another tangible outcome is a planned joint academic micro-module under development by 6 Lithuanian universities, scheduled to launch in October 2026. The pilot initiative will connect students from Lithuanian universities with MIT’s academic environment through MITx and teaching practices.

Reflecting on the broader exchange, Professor Wood also highlighted the mutual learning dimension of the visit:

I also learned a lot about Lithuanian self-reliance and independence in conversations with members of the delegation. Overall, it was a fascinating and fruitful set of meetings and discussions. I’m delighted that so many wonderful colleagues were able to come to visit.

Summarizing the experience, participants emphasized that MIT’s model should be seen as a source of inspiration rather than a blueprint.

MIT’s environment is unique. You cannot simply transfer it to another system, Ina Žurkuvienė noted. Not all science needs to become business, but where it does, it requires strong support. This is a broader systemic question – but it is one worth exploring.

Special thanks to Gediminas Urbonas, Deliana Ernst, Ekaterina Zabrovski for making this visit so enriching.

About the Consortium

The Lithuanian Consortium for Engagement with MIT brings together leading Lithuanian universities, research institutions, and companies, including Euromonitor International, Ignitis Group, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Lithuanian Railways, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Klaipėda University, Kaunas University of Technology, Mykolas Romeris University, Northway Biotech, Novian, Vytautas Magnus University, Vilnius TECH, Vilnius University, and Vilnius Academy of Arts.

Coordinator of the Consortium – Vytautas Magnus University.

Consortium activities are supported by the Research Council of Lithuania.

Related news

New doctoral dissertation
New doctoral dissertation
VILNIUS TECH Library invites you to follow the published new dissertations. The dissertation „Investigation of recurrent neural networks-based methods for early fault detection and short-term power forecasting in wind energy applications“ prepared at VILNIUS TECH by Mindaugas Jankauskas. The dissertation was prepared in 2021–2026. Scientific consultant – Prof. Dr Artūras Serackis. The dissertation was defended at the public meeting of the Dissertation Defence Council of the Scientific Field of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in the Aula Doctoralis Meeting Hall of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University at 10 a. m. on 5 June 2026. The increasing role of wind energy in modern power systems creates a growing need for reliable turbine operation, accurate short-term power forecasting, and computationally efficient data-driven methods. This dissertation addresses two related problems: early fault detection in wind turbines using supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) time-series data, and short-term wind farm power forecasting using meteorological forecasts. The dissertation aims to develop and investigate data-driven methods that improve the accuracy, efficiency, and practical applicability of short-term wind power forecasting and early wind turbine fault detection using SCADA and meteorological forecast data. The first part of the dissertation develops and investigates a virtual-sensor-based method for condition monitoring and early fault detection in wind turbines using SCADA time-series data, including the selection of the most informative features and the evaluation of factors affecting prediction accuracy. The second part of the dissertation analyzes and optimizes recurrent neural-network structures for the virtual sensor by evaluating feature-sequence formation, training schemes, and alternative activation functions to increase accuracy and reduce the computational cost relevant for practical deployment. The third part of the dissertation develops and investigates a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) based method for short-term wind farm power forecasting using meteorological forecast data, and evaluates the impact of different numerical weather prediction (NWP) sources and the suitability of an objective function with a normalized Nord Pool price multiplier for day-ahead energy production forecasts. The dissertation contributes to the fields of wind energy and artificial intelligence by proposing and validating data-driven methods for virtual sensing, residual-based early fault detection, recurrent-model optimization, computationally efficient activation-function selection, and economically meaningful short-term wind power forecasting. The research results have been published in three peer-reviewed scientific journals and one conference proceeding, and were presented at seven conferences and seminars. Doctoral dissertation readers can search via VILNIUS TECH Virtual Library.
More
Geopolitics is changing design priorities: infrastructure must withstand explosions too
Geopolitics is changing design priorities: infrastructure must withstand explosions too
Until recently, buildings were primarily designed to withstand conventional loads such as wind, snow, and everyday use. However, geopolitical developments in Europe and around the world are changing perspectives in Lithuania as well: the resilience of infrastructure to extreme scenarios, such as explosions, is becoming an integral part of the design process. Dr. Povilas Dabrila, a junior researcher at the Department of Steel and Composite Structures of the Faculty of Civil Engineering at VILNIUS TECH University, says that explosions are a rare but high-consequence threat, and traditional design approaches do not always account for such scenarios. [caption id="attachment_115773" align="alignnone" width="2560"] Povilas Dabrila[/caption] “The war in Ukraine has forced us to rethink many things. One of them is how we design, maintain, and protect infrastructure. For a long time, we focused mainly on conventional impacts: snow, wind, operational loads on buildings and bridges, and energy efficiency. Today, however, it is clear that infrastructure may also face far more dangerous scenarios, such as explosions or vehicle impacts,” he explains. According to him, infrastructure becomes even more important during crises, as people’s safety may depend on it. “Bridges, roads, buildings, energy facilities, and communication networks are essential not only for everyday life. If a bridge collapses or communications fail during a crisis, emergency assistance may not arrive in time. This is no longer merely a technical loss—it can cost lives. Therefore, infrastructure resilience today is not just an engineering issue; it is also a matter of public safety, crisis preparedness, and national resilience,” emphasizes Dabrila. What happens during an explosion? The researcher explains that the effect of an explosion on structures differs fundamentally from conventional loads. “An explosion affects a building extremely suddenly. A blast wave forms and, within a very short time, transfers significant pressure to the façade, windows, walls, and floors. What distinguishes an explosion from other challenging conditions is the duration of its impact. Snow loads a structure gradually over a long period, and even wind is not as sudden as an explosion. In the case of an explosion, the impact is felt almost instantly.” As a result, structures respond differently as well. “The key question is not only whether an element can withstand the load. What also matters is how it behaves under dynamic loading—how it deforms and whether it maintains its integrity.” According to Dabrila, explosions often first damage weaker elements such as windows, façade components, and non-load-bearing walls. The greatest risk arises when load-bearing elements are damaged, leading to more extensive structural failures. In such cases, collapse may occur. “In rare cases, localized damage can trigger a much larger collapse. For example, if a single column is damaged, internal forces are redistributed to other elements, which may also fail, causing the collapse to spread further. It is important to note that such situations are rare in ordinary buildings. Buildings are designed with safety margins, and regulations require the evaluation of structural safety and reliability.” Reducing the impact is essential According to Dabrila, blast resistance requires a comprehensive approach: both the resilience of the structure itself and measures that either increase the distance between the explosion and the building or reduce the impact of the blast. “A building’s resistance to explosions does not depend solely on stronger walls or columns. It is a system-wide issue: how the building is designed, how it behaves when damaged, and what additional measures reduce the impact before it reaches the structure. From a structural perspective, the most important thing is sufficient load-bearing capacity. If a column, beam, slab, or connection is damaged, internal forces should be able to redistribute to other structural elements. Then the failure of one element does not necessarily lead to the collapse of the entire structure.” It is also important to understand how the structure behaves under sudden loads. Explosion loads are extremely intense and short-lived, so engineers must evaluate not only whether a component can withstand the load but also how it deforms and whether the structure retains its integrity. Equally important are measures that reduce the impact itself. “These may include standoff distances, earth berms, concrete barriers, additional protective structures, screens, or nets. Their purpose is to move the threat farther away, block direct impact, or absorb part of the energy so that it does not reach the primary structure. We can see practical examples in Ukraine. The country employs various protective solutions, ranging from additional structural elements to protective nets that reduce the risk of direct drone strikes or other impacts.” How blast resistance is achieved According to Dabrila, designing structures that are more resistant to explosions involves solutions at several levels — from reducing the impact itself to strengthening the structure. “The first goal is to reduce the impact before it reaches the building. This can be achieved through standoff distances, concrete blocks, earth berms, barriers, protective fences, anti-drone nets, or additional structural installations. At the same time, the most critical structural components — columns, slabs, walls, and connections — are strengthened. This can be done using steel, reinforced concrete, composite materials, or additional bracing.” Energy-absorbing systems are also used, including protective panels, multilayer façades, and composite modules. Their purpose is to absorb part of the blast energy and reduce damage to the primary structure. According to Dabrila, digital technologies make it possible to evaluate potential scenarios in advance. “Modeling is also extremely important. Today, numerical models allow us to evaluate how a building or its individual elements would behave during an explosion, impact, or another extreme event. This enables us to base decisions on calculations and testing rather than assumptions. In the future, I believe we will see more lightweight, easily installable protective systems — for example, multilayer composite modules that can be used to protect existing buildings and infrastructure.” Science is seeking practical solutions Dabrila explains that research in this field is focused not only on theory but also on practical applications in infrastructure design. The Faculty of Civil Engineering at VILNIUS TECH studies how structures and materials behave under complex loading conditions. “Our research focuses on structural resistance to extreme loads and the development of lightweight multilayer composite systems. We are looking for solutions that could provide additional protection for buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure against impacts, blast waves, high temperatures, and similar threats. One area of research involves protective composite modules that could be installed on existing structures and serve as an additional protective layer.” According to him, both the materials and their internal structure are important. “Different layers, materials, and internal geometries can be combined, including energy-absorbing structures. The goal is to make the protection as lightweight as possible while maximizing energy absorption.” Experimental testing conducted at the faculty helps researchers understand the real behavior of materials, while numerical modeling allows this knowledge to be applied on a larger scale. “Through testing, we observe how materials actually deform and fail. Modeling allows us to scale those results up — for example, evaluating not only a small specimen but also a structural component or a real-world structure. Such research is important because it can lead to practical recommendations: which materials to choose, what layer configurations to use, how to attach protective modules, and where protection would provide the greatest benefit.” The goal is to control damage Dabrila stresses that it is impossible to make buildings completely resistant to explosions. Everything depends on the size of the explosion, the distance from the blast, the building’s structural system, the surrounding environment, and how the impact reaches the building. “The primary objective is usually not to make a building ‘indestructible’ but to control the damage. This means setting clear priorities. The most important goals are protecting people, preventing sudden collapse, reducing damage, and, if possible, maintaining critical functions.” In Dabrila’s view, assessing infrastructure resilience against extreme scenarios has not yet become common practice in Lithuania. Explosions and other extreme scenarios are typically considered only for specific types of facilities. However, changing circumstances are also changing design priorities. “There is increasing discussion about civil protection, critical infrastructure security, and the resilience of facilities under crisis conditions. As a result, this topic is gradually moving from a narrow specialist field into a broader engineering and national security issue.” He notes that much still depends on the client’s perspective. “Such solutions often involve additional costs, while their benefits become apparent only during a crisis. As a result, it can be difficult to justify the investment, especially when the primary focus is minimizing construction costs.” Nevertheless, he believes that building resilience should be viewed not as an extra expense but as a risk management measure. “Resilience is not a luxury — it is risk management. Not every project requires the most expensive solutions, but critical facilities should be subject to higher standards. Sometimes even simple measures — better site planning, protective barriers, or strengthening critical structural elements—can significantly reduce risk.” In his opinion, infrastructure security will increasingly be viewed as part of national resilience. “Whether such solutions become a standard part of the design process will depend on clients’ attitudes and on clear requirements and methodologies. Designers need to know when such scenarios must be assessed and how to evaluate them. I believe that, at least for critical infrastructure, such assessments should become standard practice. Not every building requires the same level of protection, but the most important facilities should be designed with extreme scenarios in mind.”
More