Home
About University
News
Experts on Ticket Prices in Vilnius: How to Balance Accessibility and Quality?

2025-01-30
Experts on Ticket Prices in Vilnius: How to Balance Accessibility and Quality?
The increase in public transport ticket prices in Vilnius is a pressing issue that will directly impact thousands of residents and visitors. The decision, currently under discussion by the City Council, could have significant consequences not only on passenger behavior but also on the overall sustainable mobility strategy of the city.
It is crucial to thoroughly assess the rationale behind this decision, its potential effects, and whether it will truly contribute to the improvement of public transport services, say experts from VILNIUS TECH. According to the proposed plan, the price of a monthly ticket would rise from €29 to €45, while the annual pass would increase from €310 to €480. This raises concerns about whether such changes will create financial burdens for frequent users and diminish the attractiveness of public transport.
Changes Could Push Commuters to Private Cars
While public transport fares in Vilnius have remained unchanged since 2013, inflation has increased by more than 50% during this period. Nevertheless, it is essential that any price adjustments remain balanced and justified, says Dr. Algita Miečinskienė, head of the Department of Financial Engineering.
Pricing changes should not only aim to cover rising operational costs but also ensure that public transport remains accessible and competitive compared to private vehicles.
"To achieve the right balance, it is necessary to rely on data about passenger behavior, consider alternative funding mechanisms such as zonal pricing or discounts for residents, and guarantee that higher fares translate into tangible quality improvements—more frequent routes, more comfortable vehicles, and better infrastructure," explains Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė, Associate Professor at the Department of Management.
Contradiction to City Goals
A sudden fare hike may reduce the appeal of public transport and push users to seek alternatives, such as private cars. This contradicts the city's goal of reducing traffic congestion and promoting sustainable urban mobility.
"As Vilnius holds the title of European Green Capital, its public transport policies should align with the city's strategic objectives—reducing pollution levels, managing traffic flows more efficiently, and enhancing residents' quality of life. To achieve this, fare increases must go hand in hand with real improvements in public transport services, such as better route planning, more frequent service, attractive pricing options for locals, and a clear vision of how these changes will contribute to the city's sustainable mobility plan," says Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė.
Examining experiences from other cities, successful public transport pricing reforms are often linked to clear strategies and investments in service quality. For example, Tallinn introduced free public transport for city residents to reduce car usage and encourage public transport. This decision was based on comprehensive analysis and clear objectives.
According to the experts, Vilnius lacks detailed data on how fare increases will impact residents in different districts, what specific quality improvements are planned, and how existing infrastructure shortcomings will be addressed. Without this information, the fare hike appears to be an insufficiently justified decision that could negatively affect both passenger experience and the city's sustainable mobility goals.
No Competitors—No Alternatives
"As Vilnius' public transport system is a municipal enterprise and essentially a monopoly, it faces no direct competition. Passengers have no real alternatives, as most routes are served by a single operator. As a monopolist, the company has flexibility in setting fares. Demand for such essential services is inelastic, meaning that an X% price increase will lead to a demand drop of less than X%, ultimately increasing the operator's revenue. Consumers almost always perceive price hikes negatively, unless the product is in exceptionally high demand, such as medical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, when prices surged drastically. A nearly 100% fare increase is highly unusual and is bound to spark discontent among many users," explains Dr. A. Miečinskienė.
Experts emphasize that before making a decision on public transport fare increases in Vilnius, a comprehensive analysis is essential. It is crucial to evaluate the potential impact on consumer behavior and ensure that additional revenue is allocated to tangible service improvements. Only then can long-term positive outcomes be achieved for both city residents and the public transport system itself.
Authors: Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė, Associate Professor at the Department of Management, VILNIUS TECH; Dr. Algita Miečinskienė, Associate Professor at the Department of Financial Engineering, VILNIUS TECH.
It is crucial to thoroughly assess the rationale behind this decision, its potential effects, and whether it will truly contribute to the improvement of public transport services, say experts from VILNIUS TECH. According to the proposed plan, the price of a monthly ticket would rise from €29 to €45, while the annual pass would increase from €310 to €480. This raises concerns about whether such changes will create financial burdens for frequent users and diminish the attractiveness of public transport.
Changes Could Push Commuters to Private Cars
While public transport fares in Vilnius have remained unchanged since 2013, inflation has increased by more than 50% during this period. Nevertheless, it is essential that any price adjustments remain balanced and justified, says Dr. Algita Miečinskienė, head of the Department of Financial Engineering.
Pricing changes should not only aim to cover rising operational costs but also ensure that public transport remains accessible and competitive compared to private vehicles.
"To achieve the right balance, it is necessary to rely on data about passenger behavior, consider alternative funding mechanisms such as zonal pricing or discounts for residents, and guarantee that higher fares translate into tangible quality improvements—more frequent routes, more comfortable vehicles, and better infrastructure," explains Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė, Associate Professor at the Department of Management.
Contradiction to City Goals
A sudden fare hike may reduce the appeal of public transport and push users to seek alternatives, such as private cars. This contradicts the city's goal of reducing traffic congestion and promoting sustainable urban mobility.
"As Vilnius holds the title of European Green Capital, its public transport policies should align with the city's strategic objectives—reducing pollution levels, managing traffic flows more efficiently, and enhancing residents' quality of life. To achieve this, fare increases must go hand in hand with real improvements in public transport services, such as better route planning, more frequent service, attractive pricing options for locals, and a clear vision of how these changes will contribute to the city's sustainable mobility plan," says Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė.
Examining experiences from other cities, successful public transport pricing reforms are often linked to clear strategies and investments in service quality. For example, Tallinn introduced free public transport for city residents to reduce car usage and encourage public transport. This decision was based on comprehensive analysis and clear objectives.
According to the experts, Vilnius lacks detailed data on how fare increases will impact residents in different districts, what specific quality improvements are planned, and how existing infrastructure shortcomings will be addressed. Without this information, the fare hike appears to be an insufficiently justified decision that could negatively affect both passenger experience and the city's sustainable mobility goals.
No Competitors—No Alternatives
"As Vilnius' public transport system is a municipal enterprise and essentially a monopoly, it faces no direct competition. Passengers have no real alternatives, as most routes are served by a single operator. As a monopolist, the company has flexibility in setting fares. Demand for such essential services is inelastic, meaning that an X% price increase will lead to a demand drop of less than X%, ultimately increasing the operator's revenue. Consumers almost always perceive price hikes negatively, unless the product is in exceptionally high demand, such as medical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, when prices surged drastically. A nearly 100% fare increase is highly unusual and is bound to spark discontent among many users," explains Dr. A. Miečinskienė.
Experts emphasize that before making a decision on public transport fare increases in Vilnius, a comprehensive analysis is essential. It is crucial to evaluate the potential impact on consumer behavior and ensure that additional revenue is allocated to tangible service improvements. Only then can long-term positive outcomes be achieved for both city residents and the public transport system itself.
Authors: Dr. Jolanta Nalivaikė, Associate Professor at the Department of Management, VILNIUS TECH; Dr. Algita Miečinskienė, Associate Professor at the Department of Financial Engineering, VILNIUS TECH.
-
- Page administrators:
- Monika Daukintytė
- Ugnė Daraškevičiūtė
- Monika Daukintytė